ROLE OF CONTEXT IN STATISTICS: INTERPRETING SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL EVENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i1.72Keywords:
Statistics teacher education, Statistical reasoning, TinkerPlots, Context, Pre-service mathematics teacherAbstract
Recent educational reforms include a vision of integrating reflective practice and contextual consideration into statistics education. Yet, statistics courses are rarely taught in a way that connects the data-enriched world to the educational experiences of learners. This deficiency highlights the need for statistics teaching courses to be aligned with the endeavors to equip pre-service mathematics teachers (PMTs) with skills needed in a data-enriched world. The data for the case study reported in this paper were collected from a newly developed statistics teaching course implemented at a university in Turkey. The aim of the research was to explore how seven PMTs used their context knowledge of data to examine statistical information critically. Researchers collected and analyzed videos of classroom activities, PMTs’ written work, and their written Google Blogger reflections. Results suggested the PMTs’ evaluation of examined historical events shifted from an emphasis on personal knowledge and experiences to the use of statistical reasoning and contextual knowledge. Context helped them understand the story reflected in the data, revise their initial perceptions or understanding of the events under examination, and pose further statistical inquiry questions.
References
Arteaga, P., Batanero, C., Contreras, J. M., & Cañadas, G. R. (2015). Statistical graphs complexity and reading levels: a study with prospective teachers. Statistique et Enseignement, 6(1), 3–23.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Atabey, F. (2015). The ampihibious operation of the allied forces to the Gallipoli Peninsula (25th April 1915). (see paper for publication details)
Atomic Bomb Museum. (2006). After the bomb: The survivors. www.AtomicBombMuseum.org/4_survivors.shtml
Bargagliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., & Spangler, D. (2020). Pre-K–12 Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report II. American Statistical Association and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Ben-Zvi D., & Berger K. (2016) Children’s wonder how to wander between data and context. In D. Ben-Zvi, & K. Makar K. (Eds), The teaching and learning of statistics (pp. 25–36), Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23470-0_3
Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. B. (2004). Statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking: Goals, definitions, and challenges. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. B. Garfield, (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 3–16). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bonner, A., & Tolhurst, G. (2002). Insider-outsider perspectives of participant observation. Nurse Researcher, 9(4), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2002.07.9.4.7.c6194
Bottorff, J. L. (1994). Using videotaped recordings in qualitative research. In: J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 244–261). SAGE Publications.
Casey, S. A., Harison, T., & Hudson, R. (2021). Characteristics of statistical investigations tasks created by preservice teachers. Investigations in Mathematics Learning,13(4), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2021.1990659
Chick, H. L., & Pierce, R. (2012). Teaching for statistical literacy: Utilising affordances in real-world data. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9303-2
Cobb, G. W., & Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), 801–823.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.
D’Ambrosio, U. (1999). Literacy, matheracy, and technocracy: A trivium for today. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0102_3
D’Ambrosio, U. (2016). Ethnomathematics: A response to the changing role of mathematics in society. In P. Ernest, B. Sriraman & N. Ernest (Eds.), Critical mathematics education: Theory, praxis and reality (pp. 23–34). Information Age Publishing.
da Ponte, J. P. (2011). Preparing teachers to meet the challenges of statistics education. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics: Challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 299–309). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_29
DeLyser, D. (2001). “Do you really live here?” Thoughts on insider research. Geographical Review, 91(1), 441–453.
DelMas, R. C. (2002). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and learning: A commentary. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2002.11910679
Engel, J., Schiller, A., Frischemeier, D., & Biehler, R. (2016, July). Statistics education and monitoring progress towards civil rights. In J. Engel (Ed.), Promoting understanding of statistics about society: Proceedings of the Roundtable Conference of the International Association of Statistics Education (IASE). Berlin, Germany.
Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x
Garfield, J. B. (2003). Assessing statistical reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v2i1.557
Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0176-6
Gerrish, K. (1997). Being a ‘marginal native’: Dilemmas of the participant observer. Nurse Researcher, 5(1), 25–34.
Gil, E., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). Explanations and context in the emergence of students' informal inferential reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.538295
Horton, N. J. (2015). Challenges and opportunities for statistics and statistical education: Looking back, looking forward. The American Statistician, 69(2), 138–145.
Hsu, W. L., Preston, D. L., Soda, M., Sugiyama, H., Funamoto, S., Kodama, K., Kimura, A., Kamada, N., Dohy, H., Tomonaga, M., Iwanaga, M., Miyazaki, Y., Cullings, H. M., Akihiko Suyama, A., Kotaro Ozasa, K., Shore, R. E., & Mabuchi K. (2013). The incidence of leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma among atomic bomb survivors: 1950–2001. Radiation Research, 179(3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1667/rr2892.1
Khairiree, K., & Kurusatian, P. (2009). Enhancing students’ understanding statistics with TinkerPlots: Problem-based learning approach. https://atcm.mathandtech.org/EP2009/papers_full/2812009_17324.pdf
Konold, C. & Higgins, T. L. (2003). Reasoning about data. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds), A research companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (pp. 193–215). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Konold, C., & Miller, C. (2005). TinkerPlots: Dynamic data Exploration. [Software]. Key Curriculum Press.
Langrall, C. W. (2010). Does context expertise make a difference when dealing with data. Data and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society. In C. Reading (Ed.), Data and context in statistics education: towards an evidence-based society. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS, Ljubljana, Slovenia). International Statistical Institute.
Langrall, C., Nisbet, S., Mooney, E., & Jansem, S. (2011). The role of context expertise when comparing data. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.538620
Leavy, A. M. (2010). The challenge of preparing preservice teachers to teach informal inferential reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 9(1) 46–67. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v5i2.502
Lee, H. S., & Hollebrands, K. F. (2011). Characterising and developing teachers’ knowledge for teaching statistics with technology. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics: Challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 359–369). Springer.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Lovett, J. N., & Lee, H. S. (2017). New standards require teaching more statistics: are preservice secondary mathematics teachers ready? Journal of Teacher Education, 68(3), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117697918
Makar, K. (2013). Predict! Teaching statistics using informal statistical inference. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 69(4), 34–40.
Makar, K., Bakker, A., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). The reasoning behind informal statistical inference. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1/2), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.538301
Makar, K., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). The role of context in developing reasoning about informal statistical inference. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.538291
Makar, K., & Rubin, A. (2009). A framework for thinking about informal statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v8i1.457
Ministry of Industry and Technology. (2018, July 2). What’s GAP? http://www.gap.gov.tr/en/what-s-gap-page-1.html
Monteiro, C., & Ainley, J. (2007). Investigating the interpretation of media graphs among student teachers. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(3), 187–207.
Pfannkuch, M. (2011). The role of context in developing informal statistical inferential reasoning: A classroom study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.538302
Pfannkuch, M., & Rubick, A (2002). An exploration of students’ statistical thinking with given data. Statistics Education Research Journal, 1(2), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v1i2.562
Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002
Rubin, A. (2007). Much has changed; little has changed: Revisiting the role of technology in statistics education 1992–2007. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/833239sw
Skovsmose, O. (2013). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3556-8
Smyth, A., & Holian, R. (2008). Credibility issues in research from within organisations. In P. Sikes & A. Potts (Eds.), Researching education from the inside (pp. 33–47). Taylor & Francis.
Tate, W. F. (1995). Returning to the root: A culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543676
Unluer, S. (2012). Being an insider researcher while conducting case study research. Qualitative Report, 17, Article 58.
Watson, J. M. (2008). Exploring beginning inference with Grade 7 students. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v7i2.470
Wells, H. G. (1903). Mankind in the making. Chapman & Hall.
Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x
Wild, C. J., Pfannkuch, M., Regan, M., & Horton, N. J. (2011). Towards more accessible conceptions of statistical inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 174(2), 247–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985x.2010.00678.x
Wilks, S. S. (1951). Undergraduate statistical education. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46(253), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1951.10500763
