Undergraduate students' inconsistent routines when engaging in statistical reasoning concerning mode
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.691Keywords:
Inconsistent routines, statistical reasoning, mode, data comparisonAbstract
Using the commognitive construct of routine—repetitive rules or patterns observed in statistical discourse—we aimed to investigate how students use inconsistent routines when engaging in statistical reasoning about mode in the context of comparing modes across several data groups. The study data was collected by distributing mode-related questions to students through a Google Form, followed by interviews. Four mode-related questions were given to 43 undergraduate students participating in the study. The results showed that routine plays a significant role in statistical reasoning. The study identified two factors that contributed to the occurrence of inconsistent routines among students: (a) the way students described the data display and (b) the disconnection between routine and endorsed narrative. The results of this research highlight the importance of providing students with opportunities to work with diverse forms and conditions of data associated with mode.
References
Bakker, A. (2003). The early history of average values and implications for education. Journal of Statistics Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2003.11910694
Bargagliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., & Spangler, D., A. (2020). Pre-K–12 guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education II (GAISE II): A framework for statistics and data science education. American Statistical Association and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Ben-Zvi, D. (2004). Reasoning about variability in comparing distributions. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v3i2.547
Bennett, J., Briggs, W. L., & Triola, M. F. (2017). Statistical reasoning for everyday life (5th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Biehler, R., Frischemeier, D., Reading, C., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2018). Reasoning about data. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield, (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 139–192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_5
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.
Crooks, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2014). Defining and measuring conceptual knowledge in mathematics. Developmental Review, 34(4), 344–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.10.001
Fernández-León, A., Gavilán-Izquierdo, J. M., González-Regaña, A. J., Martín-Molina, V., & Toscano, R. (2021). Identifying routines in the discourse of undergraduate students when defining. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(2), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00301-1
Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs: Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124–158. https://doi.org/10.2307/749671
Frischemeier, D. (2019). Statistical reasoning when comparing groups with software—Frameworks and their application to qualitative video data. In G. Burrill & D. Ben-Zvi (Eds.), Topics and trends in current statistics education research: International perspectives (pp. 285–305). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03472-6_13
Garfield, J., & Chance, B. (2000). Assessment in Statistics Education: Issues and Challenges. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(1–2), 99–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0202_5
Garfield, J. (2002). The challenge of developing statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2002.11910676
Garfield, J. B., Ben-Zvi, D., Chance, B., Medina, E., Roseth, C., & Zieffler, A. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8383-9
Groth, R. E., & Bergner, & J. A. (2006). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual and procedural knowledge of mean, median, and mode. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0801_3
Güçler, B. (2013). Examining the discourse on the limit concept in a beginning-level calculus classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9438-2
Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Erlbaum Associates.
Ioannou, M. (2018). Commognitive analysis of undergraduate mathematics students’ first encounter with the subgroup test. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(2), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0222-6
Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9761-8
Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Mooney, E. S., & Thornton, C. A. (2004). Models of development in statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 97–117). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_5
Karatoprak, R., Karagöz Akar, G., & Börkan, B. (2015). Prospective elementary and secondary school mathematics teachers’ statistical reasoning. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 7(2), 107–124. https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/69/67
Konold, C., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., Lohmeier, J., & Lipson, A. (1993). Inconsistencies in students’ reasoning about probability. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(5), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.24.5.0392
Kotsopoulos, D., Lee, J., Heide, D., & Schell, A. (2009). Discursive routines and endorsed narratives as instances of mathematical cognition. In S. L. Swars, D. W. Stinson, & S. Lemons-Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 5, pp. 42–49). Georgia State University. https://pmena.org/pmenaproceedings/PMENA%2031%202009%20Proceedings.pdf
Landtblom, K., & Sumpter, L. (2019). Teachers and prospective teachers’ conceptions about averages. Journal of Adult Learning, Knowledge and Innovation, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1556/2059.03.2019.02
Landtblom, K. (2023). Opportunities to learn mean, median, and mode afforded by textbook tasks. Statistics Education Research Journal, 22(3), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i3.655
Lavie, I., & Sfard, A. (2019). How children individualize numerical routines: Elements of a discursive theory in making. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 419–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1646650
Leavy, A., & O’Loughlin, N. (2006). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the mean: Moving beyond the arithmetic average. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 53–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9003-y
Magaldi, D., & Berler, M. (2020). Semi-structured interviews. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 4825–4830). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3
Makar, K., & Confrey, J. (2004). Secondary teachers’ statistical reasoning in comparing two groups. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 353–373). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_15
Mann, P. S. (2013). Introductory statistics (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Martin, W. G., Carter, J., Forster, S., Howe, R., Kader, G., Kepner, H., Quander, J. R., McCallum, W., Robinson, E., Sniper, V., & Valdez, P. (2009). Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sense making. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Mpofu, S., & Pournara, C. (2018). Learner participation in the functions discourse: A focus on asymptotes of the hyperbola. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2017.1409170
Nardi, E., Ryve, A., Stadler, E., & Viirman, O. (2014). Commognitive analyses of the learning and teaching of mathematics at university level: The case of discursive shifts in the study of calculus. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.918338
Ng, O. L. (2016). The interplay between language, gestures, dragging and diagrams in bilingual learners’ mathematical communications. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3), 307–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9652-9
Park, M.-S., & Lee, K.-H. (2014). The impact of a teacher’s attention deriving on students’ statistical discourse. In K. Makar, B. de Sousa, & R. Gould (Eds.), Sustainability in statistics education. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS9, July, 2014). Flagstaff, Arizona, USA. International Statistical Institute. https://icots.info/9/proceedings/pdfs/ICOTS9_3B3_PARK.pdf
Pratiwi, E., Nusantara, T., Susiswo, S., & Muksar, M. (2022). Routines’ errors when solving mathematics problems cause cognitive conflict. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(2), 773–779. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i2.21911
Rahmatina, D., Nusantara, T., Prata, I. N., & Susanto, H. (2022). Statistical reasoning process of students in decision making using commognitive framework. Acta Scientiae, 24(3), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6603
Rittle-Johnson, B., & Star, J. R. (2009). Compared with what? The effects of different comparisons on conceptual knowledge and procedural flexibility for equation solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014224
Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press.
Sfard, A. (2018). Commognition. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp.
–7). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_100031-1
Sfard A. (2020). Commognition. In S. Lerman (Ed.). Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp.
–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100031
Shin, D. (2021). A framework for understanding how preservice teachers notice students’ statistical reasoning about comparing groups. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(5), 699–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1699968
Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, T. (2011). Combining theories to analyse classroom discourse: A method to study learning process. In M. Pytlak, R. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. CERME 7 (pp. 2524–2532). University of Rzeszów, Poland. https://wwwold.mathematik.tu-dortmund.de/~prediger/ERME/CERME7-Proceedings-2011.pdf
Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, T. (2015). Classroom engagement towards using definitions for developing mathematical objects: The case of function. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90(2), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9624-0
Tabach, M., & Nachlieli, T. (2016). Communicational perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics: prologue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91(3), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9638-7
Toscano, R., Gavilán-Izquierdo, J. M., & Sánchez, V. (2019). A study of pre-service primary teachers’ discourse when solving didactic-mathematical tasks. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108631
Turner, P., & Turner, S. (2009). Triangulation in practice. Virtual Reality, 13(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-009-0117-2
van Garderen, D., Scheuermann, A., & Poch, A. (2014). Challenges students identified with a learning disability and as high-achieving experience when using diagrams as a visualization tool to solve mathematics word problems. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0519-1
Viirman, O. (2015). Explanation, motivation and question posing routines in university mathematics teachers’ pedagogical discourse: A commognitive analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(8), 1165–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1034206
Wang, S., & Kinzel, M. (2014). How do they know it is a parallelogram? Analysing geometric discourse at van Hiele level 3. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 288–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2014.933711
Zayyadi, M., Nusantara, T., Subanji, Hidayanto, E., & Sulandra, I. M. (2019). A commognitive framework: The process of solving mathematical problems of middle school students. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.2.7
