YOUNG CHILDREN’S USE OF SUBJECTIVE THINKING IN RESPONSE TO PROBABILISTIC TASKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v21i3.8Keywords:
Statistics education research, Probabilistic thinking, Subjective thinking, Task-based group interviews, Early childhood, KindergartenAbstract
This paper reports on a study that investigated young children’s responses to a range of probabilistic tasks. A central aspect of the study was our examination of the children’s use of subjective thinking. Most research that has been conducted in relation to young children’s probabilistic thinking has focused on the extent to which young children can identify the most and least likely outcome of experiments. There is, however, limited research into the types of judgements children use when making these identifications. For example, while a small number of studies have reported on children’s use of subjective thinking, there is an absence of research focusing on the role of subjectivity and the range of beliefs on which these judgements are based. In this research, the subjective thinking of children aged 5–6 years in Ireland was examined to address this gap in current knowledge. The data were collected through task-based group interviews and analysed using thematic analysis. Results suggest that a range of personal beliefs and experiences influence young children’s probabilistic thinking including the physical position of objects, personal affinity for one possible outcome, a desire to win, and the influence of previous experiments.
References
Alderson, P. (2004). Ethics. In S. Fraser, V. Lewis, S. Ding, M. Kellett, & C. Robinson (Eds.), Doing research with children and young people (pp. 97–112). SAGE Publications.
Antonopoulos, K., & Zacharos, K. (2013). Probability constructs in preschool education and how they are taught. Teachers and Teaching, 19(5), 575–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2013.827367
Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2012). Children’s understanding of probability: A literature review. Nuffield Foundation.
Bryant, P., Nunes, T., Evans, D., Barros, R., Gotterdis, L., & Terlektsi, E. (2018). What 9- and 10-year old pupils already know and what they can learn about randomness. In C. Batanero & E. J. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning stochastics: Advances in probability research education (pp. 161–180). Springer.
Cheeseman, J., & McDonough, A. (2013). Testing young children’s ideas of mass measurement. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 2013, 1–16. https://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/cheeseman.pdf
Chiesi, C., & Primi, C. (2009). Recency effects in primary-age pupils and college students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/240
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Davies, C. M. (1965). Development of the probability concept in children. Child Development, 36(3), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126923
Department of Children and Youth Affairs. (2012). Guidance for developing ethical research projects involving children. Author, Ireland.
Ellerton, N. F., & Clements, M. A. (1995). Challenging the effectiveness of pencil-and-paper tests in mathematics. In L. Velardi & J. Wakefield (Eds.), Celebrating mathematics learning (pp. 268–276). Mathematical Association of Victoria.
Estrada, A., Batanero, C., & Diaz, C. (2018). Exploring teachers’ attitudes towards probability and its teaching. In C. Batanero & E. J. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning stochastics: Advances in probability research education (pp. 313–332). Springer.
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Gandhi, H. (2018). Understanding children’s meanings of randomness in relation to random generators. In C. Batanero & E. J. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning stochastics: Advances in probability research education (pp. 181–200). Springer.
Ginsburg, H. P. (1997). Entering the child’s mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). The challenge of formative assessment in mathematics education: Children’s minds, teachers’ minds. Human Development, 52(2), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1159/000202729
Ginsburg, H. P. (2016). Helping early childhood educators to understand and assess young children’s mathematical minds. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(7), 941–646.
Goldin, G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 517–545). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Groth, R. E., Austin, J. W., Naumann, M., & Rickards, M. (2019). Toward a theoretical structure to characterize early probabilistic thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33(2), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00287-w
See the paper for the full list of references.
