LINKING PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS IN YOUNG STUDENTS’ REASONING WITH CHANCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v22i2.418Keywords:
Statistics education research, Probability, Statistics, Young learners, Graphical representations, Embodied learningAbstract
This article reports on a study in which third-grade students (8–9 years) were given a degree of agency in conducting chance experiments and representing the outcomes. Students chose their own samples of 12 coloured counters, ensuring all colours were represented. They predicted the outcomes of item selection, tested their predictions, explained the outcomes, quantified their chances of colour selections, and created two representations displaying the probabilities. Children displayed awareness of randomness and variation, together with proportional reasoning, as evident in their identification of one or more colours as having a greater chance of being selected, or equal chances when proportions of colours were equal. Evidence of children’s metarepresentational competence appeared in their creation of two representations to display their probabilistic outcomes, with bar and circle graphs, as well as stacked bars, created. The inclusion of their own forms of inscription revealed a range of probability and statistics understandings. In selecting and justifying their preferred representations for conveying their outcomes, students favoured both bar and circle graphs, with a focus on how accurately, effectively, and efficiently their representation displayed the data, with the importance of the inscriptions highlighted.
References
Abrahamson, D. (2012). Seeing chance: Perceptual reasoning as an epistemic resource for grounding compound event spaces. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0454-6
Abrahamson, D., Bakker, A. & Dutton, E. (2021). Towards an enactivist mathematics pedagogy pedagogy. In S. A. Stolz (Ed.), The body, embodiment, and education: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 156–182). Routledge.
Acredolo, C., Banks, L., Horobin, K., & O’Connor, J. (1989). Children’s ability to make probability estimates: Skills revealed through application of Anderson’s functional measurement methodology. Child Development, 60, 933–945.
Batanero, C. (2015). Understanding randomness: Challenges for research and teaching. In K. Krainer, & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics, Prague, Czech Republic (pp. 34-49).
Batanero, C., Henry, M., & Parzysz, B. (2005). The nature of chance and probability. In G. A. G. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 15–38). Springer.
Begolli, K. N., Dai, T., McGinn, K., & Booth, J. (2021). Could probability be out of proportion? Self-explanation and example-based practice help students with lower proportional reasoning skills learn probability. Instructional Science, 49(2), 441-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09550-9
Bryant, P., Barros, R., Evans, D., Gottardis, L., Nunes, T., & Terlektsi, E. (2018). What 9- and 10-year old pupils already know and what they can learn about randomness. In C. Batanero, & E. J. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning stochastics, ICME-13 monographs. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72871-1_10
Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2012). Children’s understanding of probability: A literature review. Nuffield Foundation.
Cengiz, N., & Grant, T. J. (2009). Children generate their own representations. Teaching Children Mathematics, 15(7), 438–444.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2012). Common core state standards for mathematics. https://learning.ccsso.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Math_Standards1.pdf
Department for Education. (2021). National curriculum in England: Mathematics programmes of study. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-mathematics-programmes-of-study
diSessa, A. A. (2002). Students’ criteria for representational adequacy. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 105–130). Kluwer.
diSessa, A. A. (2004). Meta-representation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2203_2
diSessa, A. A. (2007). An interactional analysis of clinical interviewing. Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 523–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701632413
diSessa, A. A., & Sherrin, B. (2000). Meta-representation: An introduction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19, 385–398.
English, L. D. (2010). Young children’s early modelling with data. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(2), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217564
English, L. D. (2013a). Surviving an avalanche of data. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(6), 365–372.
English, L. D. (2013b). Reconceptualising statistical learning in the early years. In L. D. English & J. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualising early mathematics learning (pp. 67–82). Springer.
English, L. D. (2018). Developing young children’s statistical literacy through modelling. In A. Leavy, M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, & E. Paparistodemou (Eds.), Statistics in early childhood: Supporting early statistical and probabilistic thinking (pp. 295–313). Springer.
English, L. D., & Watson, J. M. (2016). Development of probabilistic understanding in fourth grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 47(1), 27–61. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.47.1.0028
Falk, R., Falk, R. & Levin, I. (1980). A potential for learning probability in young children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, 181–204.
Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Reidel.
Fischbein, E., & Gazit, A. (1984). Does the teaching of probability improve probabilistic intuitions? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(1), 1–24.
Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J. M., Minniti, L., & White, B. J. (2017) Computational thinking: Grade 1 students and the binomial theorem. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3, 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-016-0019-3
Gauvrit N., & Morsanyi K. (2014). The equiprobability bias from a mathematical and psychological perspective. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 10(4), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0163-9
Greer, B. (2001). Understanding probabilistic thinking: The legacy of Efraim Fischbein. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45, 15–33.
Groth, R. E., Austin, J. W., Naumann, M., & Rickards, M. (2021). Toward a theoretical structure to characterize early probabilistic thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33, 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00287-w
Groth, R. E., Butler, J., & Nelson, D. (2016). Overcoming challenges in learning probability vocabulary. Teaching Statistics, 38(3), 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12109
Hutchison, L., Ellsworth, J., & Yovich, S. (2000). Third-grade students investigate and represent data. Early Childhood Education Journal, 27(4), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECEJ.0000003357.54177.91
Ingram, J. (2022). Randomness and probability: Exploring student teachers’ conceptions. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.2016029
Innabi, H., Marton, F., & Emanuelsson, J. (in press). Sustainable learning of statistics. In G. Burrill, L. O. Souza, & E. Reston, E. (Eds). Reasoning with data and statistical thinking: An international perspective. Springer.
Langrall, C. W., (2018). The status of probability in the elementary and lower secondary school mathematics curriculum: The rise and fall of probability in school mathematics in the United States. In C. Batanero & E. J. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning stochastics. ICME-13 monographs (pp. 39–50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72871-1_3
Langrall, C. W., & Mooney, E. S. (2005). Characteristics of elementary school students’ probabilistic reasoning. In G. A. G Jones (Ed.). Exploring probability in school (pp. 95–119). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24530-8_5
Leavy, A. M., & Hourigan, M. (2020). Expanding the focus of early years mathematics education: Statistics and probability. In O. N. Saracho (Ed.). Handbook of research on the education of young children (pp. 99–112). Routledge.
Lecoutre, M. -P. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in ‘purely random’ situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(6), 557–568.
Leedy, L. (2007). It’s probably Penny. Henry Holt and Company.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2007). Contrasting emerging conceptions of distribution in contexts of error and natural variation. In M. C. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 149–176). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203810057
Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2000). Iterative refinement cycles for videotape analyses of conceptual change. In R. Lesh & A. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 665–708). Erlbaum.
Lopes, C. E., & Cox, D. (2018). The impact of culturally responsive teaching on statistical and probabilistic learning of elementary children. In A. Leavy, M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, & E. Paparistodemou (Eds) Statistics in early childhood and primary education: Early mathematics learning and development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1044-7_5
Meder, B., & Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Statistical thinking: No one left behind. In E. J. Chernoff, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives. (pp. 127–148). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_8
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
Nikiforidou, Z. (2018). Probabilistic thinking and young children: Theory and pedagogy. In A. Leavy, M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, & E. Paparistodemou (Eds.), Statistics in early childhood and primary education: Early mathematics learning and development (pp. 211–34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1044-7_2
Nilsson, P. (2014). Building a local theory for the learning of experimental probability. In H. Silfverberg, T. Tomi Kärki, & M. Hannula, (Eds.), Nordic research in mathematics education. Proceedings of NORMA14, Turku (pp. 318¬¬–328).
Nilsson, P. (2021). Sense of agency among frequently anxious learners of English in Swedish primary school: Mismatching beliefs and experiences. Acta Didactica Norden 15(2), Article 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5617/adno.8310
Nilsson, P., Eckert, A., & Pratt, D. (2018). Challenges and opportunities in experimentation-based instruction in probability. In C. Batanero & E. J. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning stochastics. ICME-13 monographs. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72871-1_4
Pfannkuch, M., & Ziedins, I. (2014). A modelling perspective on probability. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 101–116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_5
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children. (L. Leake, P., Burrell, & H. D. Fishbein, Trans.) Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1951).
Pratt, D. (2000). Making sense of the total of two dice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(5), 602–625.
Ritson, R., (1998). The development of primary school children’s understanding of probability. [Doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University Belfast].
Savard, A. (2014). Developing probabilistic thinking: What about people’s conceptions? In E. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds), Probabilistic thinking (pp. 283–298). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_15
Sharma, S. (2015). Teaching probability: A socio-constructivist perspective. Teaching Statistics, 37(3), 78–84.
Shaughnessy, M. (2003). Research on students’ understandings of probability. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifier (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 216–226). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Steinbring, H. (1991). The theoretical nature of probability in the classroom. In R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters: Probability in education (pp. 135–168). Kluwer.
Vásquez, C., & Alsina, A. (2021). Analysing probability teaching practices in primary education: What tasks do teachers implement? Mathematics, 9, 2493. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9192493
Winborn, M. (2001). Probably pistachio. Harper Collins.
